References
152 verified sources for Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures. Literature reviewed through September 2026.
- 1.Prospective cohortEpidemiologyLandmark studiesIncidence of clinically diagnosed vertebral fractures: a population-based study in Rochester, Minnesota, 1985-1989Cooper C, Atkinson EJ, O'Fallon WM, Melton LJ 3rd. J Bone Miner Res. 1992;7(2):221-7.Rochester, MN population study: clinically diagnosed vertebral fracture incidence 117/100,000 person-years, women 145 vs men 73; 83% followed moderate or no trauma.
- 2.Prospective cohortEpidemiologyPrognosisLandmark studiesRisk of new vertebral fracture in the year following a fractureLindsay R, Silverman SL, Cooper C, Hanley DA, Barton I, Broy SB. JAMA. 2001;285(3):320-3.Pooled placebo arms (n=2725): 19.2% of women with an incident vertebral fracture sustained another within 1 year; prevalent fracture raised 1-year risk 5-fold (RR 5.1).
- 3.Prospective cohortEpidemiologyPrognosisLandmark studiesVertebral fractures and mortality in older women: a prospective study. Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research GroupKado DM, Browner WS, Palermo L, Nevitt MC, Genant HK, Cummings SR. Arch Intern Med. 1999;159(11):1215-20.SOF cohort (9575 women, 8.3 years): prevalent vertebral fractures gave 1.23-fold age-adjusted mortality; 19 to 44 deaths/1000 woman-years with 0 vs 5+ fractures; pulmonary death HR 2.1.
- 4.Narrative reviewReviewsEpidemiologyImagingClinical practice. Vertebral fracturesEnsrud KE, Schousboe JT. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(17):1634-42.NEJM Clinical Practice review of vertebral fracture epidemiology, diagnosis (VFA, radiographs), acute pain management, augmentation controversy and pharmacological secondary prevention (no PubMed abstract).
- 5.Narrative reviewEpidemiologyAn estimate of the worldwide prevalence and disability associated with osteoporotic fracturesJohnell O, Kanis JA. Osteoporos Int. 2006;17(12):1726-33.Global estimate for 2000: 9.0 million osteoporotic fractures, including 1.4 million clinical vertebral fractures; 5.8 million DALYs lost, exceeding most cancers in Europe.
- 6.RetrospectiveEpidemiologyPrognosisMortality following the diagnosis of a vertebral compression fracture in the Medicare populationLau E, Ong K, Kurtz S, Schmier J, Edidin A. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(7):1479-86.Medicare 5% sample (97,142 VCF patients): mortality about twice matched controls; survival 53.9%, 30.9% and 10.5% at 3, 5 and 7 years; greater excess in men.
- 7.Prospective cohortImagingEpidemiologyLandmark studiesUnderdiagnosis of vertebral fractures is a worldwide problem: the IMPACT studyDelmas PD, van de Langerijt L, Watts NB, Eastell R, Genant H, Grauer A. J Bone Miner Res. 2005;20(4):557-63.IMPACT study (2451 osteoporotic women): local radiology reading missed vertebral fractures in 34% (false-negative 45% North America); underdiagnosis is a worldwide problem.
- 8.RetrospectiveEpidemiologyImagingRecognition of vertebral fracture in a clinical settingGehlbach SH, Bigelow C, Heimisdottir M, May S, Walker M, Kirkwood JR. Osteoporos Int. 2000;11(7):577-82.934 hospitalised older women with chest radiographs: 14.1% had moderate/severe vertebral fractures but only 1.8% received the diagnosis; 18% got any osteoporosis treatment.
- 9.Systematic review / meta-analysisEpidemiologyPrognosisSystematic reviewsPatients with prior fractures have an increased risk of future fractures: a summary of the literature and statistical synthesisKlotzbuecher CM, Ross PD, Landsman PB, Abbott TA 3rd, Berger M. J Bone Miner Res. 2000;15(4):721-39.Statistical synthesis: prior vertebral fracture confers about 4-fold risk of subsequent vertebral fracture and roughly 2-fold risk (RR 2.0) of fracture at other sites.
- 10.Prospective cohortEpidemiologyPrognosisPrevalent vertebral deformities predict mortality and hospitalization in older women with low bone mass. Fracture Intervention Trial Research GroupEnsrud KE, Thompson DE, Cauley JA, Nevitt MC, Kado DM, Hochberg MC. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000;48(3):241-9.FIT cohort (6459 women): prevalent vertebral deformities predicted mortality (RR 1.60) and hospitalisation (RR 1.18), with risk rising with number of deformities.
- 11.RetrospectivePathophysiologyEpidemiologyReduced pulmonary function in patients with spinal osteoporotic fracturesSchlaich C, Minne HW, Bruckner T, Wagner G, Gebest HJ, Grunze M. Osteoporos Int. 1998;8(3):261-7.Spinal osteoporotic fractures reduced vital capacity (93.6% vs 105.6% of predicted) and FEV1 versus chronic low back pain controls; VC correlated with spinal deformity index.
- 12.Systematic review / meta-analysisEpidemiologyPrognosisSystematic reviewsCharacteristics and outcomes of hospitalised patients with vertebral fragility fractures: a systematic reviewOng T, Kantachuvesiri P, Sahota O, Gladman JRF. Age Ageing. 2018;47(1):17-25.19 studies of hospitalised vertebral fragility fracture patients: mean age 81, median stay 10 days, 1-year mortality 20-27%, 34-50% discharged to care facilities, one-third started osteoporosis treatment.
- 13.Prospective cohortClassificationImagingLandmark studiesDefinition & diagnosisVertebral fracture assessment using a semiquantitative techniqueGenant HK, Wu CY, van Kuijk C, Nevitt MC. J Bone Miner Res. 1993;8(9):1137-48.Genant semiquantitative grading (grade 1 mild 20-25%, 2 moderate 25-40%, 3 severe >40% height loss) is reliable for prevalent and incident vertebral fracture assessment when criteria are defined.
- 14.Expert opinionClassificationGuidelinesClassification of Osteoporotic Thoracolumbar Spine Fractures: Recommendations of the Spine Section of the German Society for Orthopaedics and Trauma (DGOU)Schnake KJ, Blattert TR, Hahn P, Franck A, Hartmann F, Ullrich B. Global Spine J. 2018;8(2 Suppl):46S-49S.DGOU OF classification: OF1 oedema only; OF2 deformation with <1/5 posterior wall; OF3 >1/5 posterior wall; OF4 frame collapse/pincer; OF5 distraction/rotation; interobserver kappa 0.63.
- 15.Expert opinionGuidelinesClassificationSurgeryNonsurgical and Surgical Management of Osteoporotic Vertebral Body Fractures: Recommendations of the Spine Section of the German Society for Orthopaedics and Trauma (DGOU)Blattert TR, Schnake KJ, Gonschorek O, Gercek E, Hartmann F, Katscher S. Global Spine J. 2018;8(2 Suppl):50S-55S.DGOU OF-score from 707 cases: <6 points favours nonsurgical care, >6 favours surgery; minimally invasive, cement-augmented or high-purchase fixation preferred; goal is rapid painless mobilisation.
- 16.RetrospectiveClassificationLandmark studiesAOSpine thoracolumbar spine injury classification system: fracture description, neurological status, and key modifiersVaccaro AR, Oner C, Kepler CK, Dvorak M, Schnake K, Bellabarba C. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013;38(23):2028-37.AOSpine thoracolumbar classification: type A compression, B tension-band, C translation, plus neurological grade and modifiers; morphology reliability kappa 0.72.
- 17.Narrative reviewReviewsClassificationSurgeryOsteoporotic Thoracolumbar Fractures-How Are They Different?-Classification and Treatment AlgorithmRajasekaran S, Kanna RM, Schnake KJ, Vaccaro AR, Schroeder GD, Sadiqi S. J Orthop Trauma. 2017;31 Suppl 4:S49-S56.Review: osteoporotic fractures are half of all osteoporotic fractures, mostly thoracolumbar and stable; up to 30% develop painful nonunion, kyphosis or neurological deficit; algorithm from bracing to instrumentation.
- 18.Prospective cohortImagingPathophysiologyLandmark studiesThe dynamic mobility of vertebral compression fracturesMcKiernan F, Jensen R, Faciszewski T. J Bone Miner Res. 2003;18(1):24-9.Standing versus supine radiographs in 41 vertebroplasty patients: dynamic mobility in 44% of patients (35% of vertebrae), all with intravertebral clefts; height increased 106% when mobile.
- 19.RetrospectiveImagingLandmark studiesDiscrimination of metastatic from acute osteoporotic compression spinal fractures with MR imagingJung HS, Jee WH, McCauley TR, Ha KY, Choi KH. Radiographics. 2003;23(1):179-87.MRI signs of metastasis: convex posterior border, pedicle/posterior element signal, epidural or paraspinal mass; osteoporotic: band-like low signal, spared marrow, retropulsed fragment, multiple fractures.
- 20.RetrospectiveImagingLandmark studiesAcute vertebral collapse due to osteoporosis or malignancy: appearance on unenhanced and gadolinium-enhanced MR imagesCuénod CA, Laredo JD, Chevret S, Hamze B, Naouri JF, Chapaux X. Radiology. 1996;199(2):541-9.93 acute collapses: retropulsed fragment, preserved T1 signal and band-like enhancement favour osteoporosis; convex posterior cortex, epidural mass, pedicle involvement and inhomogeneous enhancement favour malignancy.
- 21.RetrospectivePathophysiologyImagingPrognosisPathogenesis and diagnosis of delayed vertebral collapse resulting from osteoporotic spinal fractureIto Y, Hasegawa Y, Toda K, Nakahara S. Spine J. 2002;2(2):101-6.28 patients with delayed collapse and neurological deficit: intravertebral cleft seen in 79% before deficit onset; cleft and instability are risk factors warranting immobilisation and careful observation.
- 22.Narrative reviewReviewsPathophysiologyDefinition & diagnosisKummel disease: a not-so-rare complication of osteoporotic vertebral compression fracturesFreedman BA, Heller JG. J Am Board Fam Med. 2009;22(1):75-8.Case-based review of Kummel disease (post-fracture avascular necrosis with intravertebral cleft) for primary care, with radiographic and histological workup.
- 23.Prospective cohortImagingPrognosisLandmark studiesCharacteristic radiographic or magnetic resonance images of fresh osteoporotic vertebral fractures predicting potential risk for nonunion: a prospective multicenter studyTsujio T, Nakamura H, Terai H, Hoshino M, Namikawa T, Matsumura A. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011;36(15):1229-35.350 conservatively treated OVFs: nonunion 13.5% at 6 months; predictors were thoracolumbar level, middle-column injury, and T2 confined-high or diffuse-low signal patterns.
- 24.Systematic review / meta-analysisPrognosisImagingSystematic reviewsOsteoporotic vertebral fractures: predictive factors for conservative treatment failure. A systematic reviewMuratore M, Ferrera A, Masse A, Bistolfi A. Eur Spine J. 2018;27(10):2565-2576.11 cohorts: intravertebral cleft and T1 total/T2 hypointense-wide patterns predict collapse; middle-column injury predicts nonunion; retropulsion >42% canal or >15 degrees dynamic wedge change predicts neurological impairment.
- 25.RetrospectiveImagingLandmark studiesHounsfield units for assessing bone mineral density and strength: a tool for osteoporosis managementSchreiber JJ, Anderson PA, Rosas HG, Buchholz AL, Au AG. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93(11):1057-63.Lumbar CT Hounsfield units correlate significantly with DXA BMD, T-scores and compressive strength, offering opportunistic bone quality assessment at no extra cost.
- 26.RetrospectiveSurgeryPrognosisOsteoporotic vertebral burst fractures with neurologic compromiseNguyen HV, Ludwig S, Gelb D. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2003;16(1):10-9.10 osteoporotic burst fractures with deficit (mean canal compromise 41%, kyphosis 28 degrees) treated by decompression and fusion: 6 improved a Frankel grade, but pain-related disability and complications were common.
- 27.Narrative reviewReviewsConservative management of patients with an osteoporotic vertebral fracture: a review of the literatureLongo UG, Loppini M, Denaro L, Maffulli N, Denaro V. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012;94(2):152-7.Review of conservative care (bed rest, analgesia, physiotherapy, orthoses): only one RCT of bracing existed; unstandardised conservative care limits comparison with cementoplasty.
- 28.Randomized trialLandmark studiesComparative study of the treatment outcomes of osteoporotic compression fractures without neurologic injury using a rigid brace, a soft brace, and no brace: a prospective randomized controlled non-inferiority trialKim HJ, Yi JM, Cho HG, Chang BS, Lee CK, Kim JH. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96(23):1959-66.60 acute OVCF patients randomised to no brace, soft or rigid brace: 12-week ODI without brace (35.95) non-inferior to soft (37.83) and rigid (33.54); pain and compression progression similar.
- 29.Randomized trialComparison of Rigid and Soft-Brace Treatments for Acute Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fracture: A Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter StudyKato T, Inose H, Ichimura S, Tokuhashi Y, Nakamura H, Hoshino M. J Clin Med. 2019;8(2).284 women aged 65-85 randomised to rigid versus soft brace for 12 weeks: no difference in anterior vertebral compression at 48 weeks, EQ-5D, VAS pain or JOABPEQ.
- 30.Systematic review / meta-analysisSystematic reviewsBracing for Acute and Subacute Osteoporotic Compression Fractures: A Systematic Review of the LiteratureHofler RC, Jones GA. World Neurosurg. 2020;141:e453-e460.16 studies (5 RCTs): bracing appears safe, but no compelling evidence that a rigid brace is superior to a soft brace or no brace.
- 31.Randomized trialSteroidsEffects of a new spinal orthosis on posture, trunk strength, and quality of life in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis: a randomized trialPfeifer M, Begerow B, Minne HW. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;83(3):177-86.Six months of a thoracolumbar orthosis (Spinomed) in women with osteoporotic vertebral fractures: back extensor strength +73%, kyphosis angle -11%, pain -38%, body sway -25%.
- 32.Systematic review / meta-analysisSystematic reviewsThe efficacy of conservative treatment of osteoporotic compression fractures on acute pain relief: a systematic review with meta-analysisRzewuska M, Ferreira M, McLachlan AJ, Machado GC, Maher CG. Eur Spine J. 2015;24(4):702-14.5 RCTs (n=350) of analgesics, orthoses and rest: very low to low quality evidence; orthoses gave medium-term pain (SMD -1.47) and disability benefit versus nothing; evidence insufficient overall.
- 33.Systematic review / meta-analysisSteroidsSystematic reviewsCalcitonin for treating acute and chronic pain of recent and remote osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysisKnopp-Sihota JA, Newburn-Cook CV, Homik J, Cummings GG, Voaklander D. Osteoporos Int. 2012;23(1):17-38.13 trials (n=589): calcitonin reduced acute pain at rest within 1 week (MD -3.39) and with mobility at 4 weeks, but showed no convincing benefit for chronic fracture pain.
- 34.Prospective cohortSteroidsThe effect of teriparatide to alleviate pain and to prevent vertebral collapse after fresh osteoporotic vertebral fractureTsuchie H, Miyakoshi N, Kasukawa Y, Nishi T, Abe H, Segawa T. J Bone Miner Metab. 2016;34(1):86-91.Fresh OVFs treated with daily or weekly teriparatide versus risedronate or no drug: lower VAS at 8-12 weeks, less collapse and kyphosis, fewer clefts with daily teriparatide.
- 35.RetrospectiveSteroidsEffect of teriparatide (rh-PTH 1-34) versus bisphosphonate on the healing of osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture: A retrospective comparative studyIwata A, Kanayama M, Oha F, Hashimoto T, Iwasaki N. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017;18(1):148.98 non-operatively treated single-level OVCFs: teriparatide shortened time-to-union (HR 1.86), union 89% vs 68% at 6 months versus alendronate; no teriparatide patient needed fracture-site surgery.
- 36.Randomized trialSurgeryLandmark studiesA randomized trial of vertebroplasty for painful osteoporotic vertebral fracturesBuchbinder R, Osborne RH, Ebeling PR, Wark JD, Mitchell P, Wriedt C. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(6):557-68.78 patients with fractures <12 months randomised to vertebroplasty or sham: no benefit at any time point; 3-month pain reduction 2.6 vs 1.9 (difference 0.6, 95% CI -0.7 to 1.8).
- 37.Randomized trialSurgeryLandmark studiesA randomized trial of vertebroplasty for osteoporotic spinal fracturesKallmes DF, Comstock BA, Heagerty PJ, Turner JA, Wilson DJ, Diamond TH. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(6):569-79.INVEST: 131 patients randomised to vertebroplasty or simulated procedure; at 1 month no difference in RDQ (0.7) or pain (0.7); crossover 51% control vs 13% by 3 months.
- 38.Randomized trialSurgeryLandmark studiesVertebroplasty versus conservative treatment in acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (Vertos II): an open-label randomised trialKlazen CA, Lohle PN, de Vries J, Jansen FH, Tielbeek AV, Blonk MC. Lancet. 2010;376(9746):1085-92.Vertos II: 202 acute fractures (<6 weeks, MRI oedema) randomised open-label; VAS reduction favoured vertebroplasty by 2.6 (1 month) and 2.0 (1 year); 53% of screened patients recovered spontaneously.
- 39.Randomized trialSurgeryLandmark studiesVertebroplasty versus sham procedure for painful acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (VERTOS IV): randomised sham controlled clinical trialFiranescu CE, de Vries J, Lodder P, Venmans A, Schoemaker MC, Smeets AJ. BMJ. 2018;361:k1551.VERTOS IV: 180 patients with acute OVCF randomised to vertebroplasty or sham (periosteal anaesthetic); VAS differences 0.2-0.45, not significant at any point through 12 months.
- 40.Randomized trialSurgeryLandmark studiesSafety and efficacy of vertebroplasty for acute painful osteoporotic fractures (VAPOUR): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trialClark W, Bird P, Gonski P, Diamond TH, Smerdely P, McNeil HP. Lancet. 2016;388(10052):1408-1416.VAPOUR: 120 patients with fractures <6 weeks and NRS >=7 randomised to vertebroplasty or placebo; NRS <4 at 14 days in 44% vs 21% (difference 23 percentage points, p=0.011).
- 41.Randomized trialSurgeryLandmark studiesEfficacy and safety of balloon kyphoplasty compared with non-surgical care for vertebral compression fracture (FREE): a randomised controlled trialWardlaw D, Cummings SR, Van Meirhaeghe J, Bastian L, Tillman JB, Ranstam J. Lancet. 2009;373(9668):1016-24.FREE: 300 patients with 1-3 acute fractures randomised to balloon kyphoplasty or nonsurgical care; SF-36 PCS improved 7.2 vs 2.0 points at 1 month (difference 5.2, p<0.0001); adverse events similar.
- 42.Randomized trialSurgeryBalloon kyphoplasty for the treatment of acute vertebral compression fractures: 2-year results from a randomized trialBoonen S, Van Meirhaeghe J, Bastian L, Cummings SR, Ranstam J, Tillman JB. J Bone Miner Res. 2011;26(7):1627-37.FREE 2-year results: kyphoplasty SF-36 PCS benefit averaged 3.24 points but lost significance by 12 months; back pain still better at 24 months; new fractures 47.5% vs 44.1%.
- 43.Randomized trialSurgeryPercutaneous vertebroplasty compared to conservative treatment in patients with painful acute or subacute osteoporotic vertebral fractures: three-months follow-up in a clinical randomized studyRousing R, Andersen MO, Jespersen SM, Thomsen K, Lauritsen J. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009;34(13):1349-54.50 patients with acute/subacute fractures randomised to vertebroplasty or conservative care: pain fell from about 8 to 2 in both groups by 3 months; vertebroplasty relief was immediate.
- 44.Systematic review / meta-analysisSurgerySystematic reviewsPercutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractureBuchbinder R, Johnston RV, Rischin KJ, Homik J, Jones CA, Golmohammadi K. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;11(11):CD006349.Cochrane update, 21 trials: versus placebo, vertebroplasty gave 0.7/10 less pain and 1.5/23 less RDQ disability at 1 month (below MCID); no important benefit; harms uncertain.
- 45.GuidelineGuidelinesSurgerySystematic reviewsThe Efficacy and Safety of Vertebral Augmentation: A Second ASBMR Task Force ReportEbeling PR, Akesson K, Bauer DC, Buchbinder R, Eastell R, Fink HA. J Bone Miner Res. 2019;34(1):3-21.Second ASBMR Task Force: vertebroplasty gives no clinically significant benefit over placebo regardless of pain duration; insufficient evidence for kyphoplasty; routine augmentation unsupported; anti-osteoporotic drugs cut subsequent vertebral fractures 40-70%.
- 46.Expert opinionGuidelinesSurgeryManagement of vertebral fragility fractures: a clinical care pathway developed by a multispecialty panel using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness MethodHirsch JA, Beall DP, Chambers MR, Andreshak TG, Brook AL, Bruel BM. Spine J. 2018;18(11):2152-2161.RAND/UCLA multispecialty pathway: MRI preferred; augmentation appropriate with positive advanced imaging and worsening symptoms or 2-4 unfavourable features; time since fracture less relevant; follow-up must address bone health.
- 47.GuidelineGuidelinesSurgeryThe treatment of symptomatic osteoporotic spinal compression fracturesEsses SI, McGuire R, Jenkins J, Finkelstein J, Woodard E, Watters WC 3rd. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2011;19(3):176-82.AAOS 2010 guideline summary: strong recommendation against vertebroplasty, moderate for 4 weeks of calcitonin, weak for kyphoplasty in neurologically intact patients; six recommendations inconclusive.
- 48.RetrospectiveSurgeryPrognosisEpidemiologyMortality risk for operated and nonoperated vertebral fracture patients in the medicare populationEdidin AA, Ong KL, Lau E, Kurtz SM. J Bone Miner Res. 2011;26(7):1617-26.Medicare 2005-2008 (858,978 VCF patients): 4-year adjusted survival 60.8% operated vs 50.0% nonoperated (HR 0.63); kyphoplasty 62.8% vs vertebroplasty 57.3% (HR 0.77).
- 49.RetrospectiveSurgeryPrognosisEpidemiologyImpact of nonoperative treatment, vertebroplasty, and kyphoplasty on survival and morbidity after vertebral compression fracture in the medicare populationChen AT, Cohen DB, Skolasky RL. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013;95(19):1729-36.Medicare 2006 (68,752 VCFs): 3-year survival 42.3% nonoperative, 49.7% vertebroplasty, 59.9% kyphoplasty; kyphoplasty HR 0.80 vs vertebroplasty; authors caution selection bias.
- 50.Systematic review / meta-analysisSurgeryPrognosisSystematic reviewsMortality Outcomes of Vertebral Augmentation (Vertebroplasty and/or Balloon Kyphoplasty) for Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-AnalysisHinde K, Maingard J, Hirsch JA, Phan K, Asadi H, Chandra RV. Radiology. 2020;295(1):96-103.Meta-analysis of >2 million patients: augmentation associated with 22% lower mortality up to 10 years (pooled HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.66-0.92); kyphoplasty HR 0.77, vertebroplasty HR 0.87 versus nonsurgical care.
- 51.Systematic review / meta-analysisSurgerySystematic reviewsComparing Percutaneous Vertebroplasty and Conservative Therapy for Treating Osteoporotic Compression Fractures in the Thoracic and Lumbar Spine: A Systematic Review and Meta-AnalysisMattie R, Laimi K, Yu S, Saltychev M. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016;98(12):1041-51.11 RCTs (n=1048): vertebroplasty gave significantly lower pain than conservative/sham control at 1-2 weeks, 2-3 months and 12 months; largest pooled effect -1.4, near the 1.5 MCID; heterogeneity high.
- 52.Systematic review / meta-analysisSurgerySystematic reviewsComparing effects of kyphoplasty, vertebroplasty, and non-surgical management in a systematic review of randomized and non-randomized controlled studiesPapanastassiou ID, Phillips FM, Van Meirhaeghe J, Berenson JR, Andersson GB, Chung G. Eur Spine J. 2012;21(9):1826-43.27 prospective controlled studies: pain reduction BKP -5.07 and VP -4.55 versus NSM -2.17; subsequent fractures 22% NSM vs 11% VP/BKP; BKP gave more kyphosis correction and less leakage.
- 53.RetrospectiveSurgeryPrognosisNew fractures after vertebroplasty: adjacent fractures occur significantly soonerTrout AT, Kallmes DF, Kaufmann TJ. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2006;27(1):217-23.432 vertebroplasty patients: 19.9% developed new fractures; 41% were adjacent, occurring at median 55 vs 127 days for non-adjacent; adjacent-level relative risk 4.62.
- 54.Randomized trialSurgeryLandmark studiesVertebroplasty versus Active Control Intervention for Chronic Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures: The VERTOS V Randomized Controlled TrialCarli D, Venmans A, Lodder P, Donga E, van Oudheusden T, Boukrab I. Radiology. 2023;308(1):e222535.VERTOS V: 80 patients with chronic (>3 months) painful OVCF and MRI oedema randomised to vertebroplasty or anaesthetic infiltration; 12-month VAS 3.9 vs 5.1 (difference 1.3, p=0.02) and better QUALEFFO.
- 55.Randomized trialSurgeryA prospective, international, randomized, noninferiority study comparing an implantable titanium vertebral augmentation device versus balloon kyphoplasty in the reduction of vertebral compression fractures (SAKOS study)Noriega D, Marcia S, Theumann N, Blondel B, Simon A, Hassel F. Spine J. 2019;19(11):1782-1795.SAKOS: 141 patients randomised to titanium implantable device (SpineJack) or balloon kyphoplasty; non-inferior on composite endpoint, better midline height restoration, adjacent fractures 12.9% vs 27.3%.
- 56.Systematic review / meta-analysisSurgerySystematic reviewsPercutaneous vertebroplasty versus conservative treatment and placebo in osteoporotic vertebral fractures: meta-analysis and critical review of the literatureLáinez Ramos-Bossini AJ, López Zúñiga D, Ruiz Santiago F. Eur Radiol. 2021;31(11):8542-8553.14 RCTs: vertebroplasty beat conservative treatment on all outcomes but showed slight-to-no advantage over placebo; benefit larger in fractures <6 weeks and versus skin-only sham.
- 57.RetrospectiveSurgeryAnterior-posterior surgery versus posterior closing wedge osteotomy in posttraumatic kyphosis with neurologic compromised osteoporotic fractureSuk SI, Kim JH, Lee SM, Chung ER, Lee JH. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003;28(18):2170-5.26 patients with post-traumatic kyphosis and deficit: posterior closing wedge osteotomy (n=15) matched anterior-posterior surgery (n=11) for Frankel improvement (73% vs 64%) with less operative time, blood loss and complications.
- 58.RetrospectiveSurgeryVertebroplasty-augmented short-segment posterior fixation of osteoporotic vertebral collapse with neurological deficit in the thoracolumbar spine: comparisons with posterior surgery without vertebroplasty and anterior surgeryUchida K, Nakajima H, Yayama T, Miyazaki T, Hirai T, Kobayashi S. J Neurosurg Spine. 2010;13(5):612-21.83 thoracolumbar collapses with deficit: vertebroplasty-augmented short posterior fixation lost 4.6 degrees correction versus 8.6 without augmentation and 4.5 with anterior surgery; neurological outcomes equivalent.
- 59.RetrospectiveSurgeryAnterior decompression and strut graft versus posterior decompression and pedicle screw fixation with vertebroplasty for osteoporotic thoracolumbar vertebral collapse with neurologic deficitsSudo H, Ito M, Kaneda K, Abumi K, Kotani Y, Nagahama K. Spine J. 2013;13(12):1726-32.50 osteoporotic collapses with deficit: anterior strut (n=32) versus posterior fixation with vertebroplasty (n=18); similar neurological recovery and correction, but 34% respiratory complications and revisions when BMD <0.60 g/cm2 anteriorly.
- 60.RetrospectiveSurgeryRole of major spine surgery using Kaneda anterior instrumentation for osteoporotic vertebral collapseKanayama M, Ishida T, Hashimoto T, Shigenobu K, Togawa D, Oha F. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2010;23(1):53-6.31 anterior Kaneda reconstructions for osteoporotic collapse with deficit: all recovered neurologically; kyphosis 31 to 13 to 21 degrees; 19% needed posterior reinforcement (severe osteoporosis or multilevel corpectomy).
- 61.RetrospectiveSurgeryPolymethylmethacrylate augmentation of pedicle screw for osteoporotic spinal surgery: a novel techniqueChang MC, Liu CL, Chen TH. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008;33(10):E317-24.41 osteoporotic patients (291 PMMA-augmented screws): VAS 9.2 to 1.5, ODI 77.5% to 44.2%, kyphosis correction loss 3 degrees, no symptomatic leakage or significant screw migration at 22 months.
- 62.Systematic review / meta-analysisSurgeryReviewsThe biomechanics of pedicle screw augmentation with cementElder BD, Lo SF, Holmes C, Goodwin CR, Kosztowski TA, Lina IA. Spine J. 2015;15(6):1432-45.Biomechanical review: PMMA and calcium ceramics enhance pedicle screw fixation in osteoporotic and revision models; fenestrated and prefill techniques comparable; extravasation risk remains.
- 63.Narrative reviewReviewsSurgeryOsteoporotic compression fractures of the spine; current options and considerations for treatmentKim DH, Vaccaro AR. Spine J. 2006;6(5):479-87.Review: acute OVCF care is bracing, analgesia and functional restoration; augmentation for pain beyond about 2 months; open decompression and stabilisation reserved for neural compression and progressive deformity.
- 64.GuidelineGuidelinesSteroidsAMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGISTS/AMERICAN COLLEGE OF ENDOCRINOLOGY CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINES FOR THE DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OF POSTMENOPAUSAL OSTEOPOROSIS-2020 UPDATECamacho PM, Petak SM, Binkley N, Diab DL, Eldeiry LS, Farooki A. Endocr Pract. 2020;26(Suppl 1):1-46.AACE/ACE 2020 guideline: 52 recommendations; stratifies high versus very-high fracture risk (including recent fracture), adds dual-action romosozumab, and outlines transitions between therapies.
- 65.GuidelineGuidelinesSteroidsPharmacological Management of Osteoporosis in Postmenopausal Women: An Endocrine Society* Clinical Practice GuidelineEastell R, Rosen CJ, Black DM, Cheung AM, Murad MH, Shoback D. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2019;104(5):1595-1622.Endocrine Society guideline: assess fracture risk with country-specific tools, integrate patient preferences, lifestyle and fall prevention; multiple agents reduce fractures with acceptable safety.
- 66.GuidelineGuidelinesSteroidsThe clinician's guide to prevention and treatment of osteoporosisLeBoff MS, Greenspan SL, Insogna KL, Lewiecki EM, Saag KG, Singer AJ. Osteoporos Int. 2022;33(10):2049-2102.BHOF Clinician's Guide: any fracture after 50 signals imminent risk; vertebral fracture carries 5-fold risk of further vertebral and 2-3-fold risk of other fractures; diagnosis persists despite BMD improvement.
- 67.Randomized trialSteroidsLandmark studiesRandomised trial of effect of alendronate on risk of fracture in women with existing vertebral fractures. Fracture Intervention Trial Research GroupBlack DM, Cummings SR, Karpf DB, Cauley JA, Thompson DE, Nevitt MC. Lancet. 1996;348(9041):1535-41.FIT vertebral fracture arm (2027 women): alendronate reduced new morphometric vertebral fractures 8.0% vs 15.0% (RR 0.53), clinical vertebral fractures RR 0.45, hip fractures RH 0.49 over 36 months.
- 68.Randomized trialSteroidsLandmark studiesEffect of parathyroid hormone (1-34) on fractures and bone mineral density in postmenopausal women with osteoporosisNeer RM, Arnaud CD, Zanchetta JR, Prince R, Gaich GA, Reginster JY. N Engl J Med. 2001;344(19):1434-41.1637 women with prior vertebral fractures: teriparatide 20 ug reduced new vertebral fractures 14% to 5% (RR 0.35) and nonvertebral fractures 6% to 3% (RR 0.47) over median 21 months.
- 69.Randomized trialSteroidsLandmark studiesDenosumab for prevention of fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosisCummings SR, San Martin J, McClung MR, Siris ES, Eastell R, Reid IR. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(8):756-65.FREEDOM (7868 women): denosumab 60 mg 6-monthly reduced new vertebral fractures 7.2% to 2.3% (RR 0.32, 68% reduction), hip fractures by 40% and nonvertebral fractures by 20% over 36 months.
- 70.Randomized trialSteroidsLandmark studiesRomosozumab or Alendronate for Fracture Prevention in Women with OsteoporosisSaag KG, Petersen J, Brandi ML, Karaplis AC, Lorentzon M, Thomas T. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(15):1417-1427.ARCH (4093 women with fragility fracture): romosozumab then alendronate cut new vertebral fractures 48% (6.2% vs 11.9%) and hip fractures 38%; more year-1 serious cardiovascular events (2.5% vs 1.9%).
- 71.Randomized trialSteroidsLandmark studiesEffects of teriparatide and risedronate on new fractures in post-menopausal women with severe osteoporosis (VERO): a multicentre, double-blind, double-dummy, randomised controlled trialKendler DL, Marin F, Zerbini CAF, Russo LA, Greenspan SL, Zikan V. Lancet. 2018;391(10117):230-240.VERO (1360 women with severe osteoporosis): teriparatide versus risedronate reduced new vertebral fractures 5.4% vs 12.0% (RR 0.44) and clinical fractures 4.8% vs 9.8% (HR 0.48) at 24 months.
- 72.GuidelineGuidelinesImagingUse of Bone Health Evaluation in Orthopedic Surgery: 2019 ISCD Official PositionAnderson PA, Morgan SL, Krueger D, Zapalowski C, Tanner B, Jeray KJ. J Clin Densitom. 2019;22(4):517-543.ISCD 2019 position: orthopaedic patients with fracture after 50, inflammatory arthritis, steroids or renal disease should have DXA before surgery; opportunistic CT Hounsfield units are reliable with moderate DXA correlation.
- 73.Expert opinionGuidelinesReviewsBone Health Optimization: Beyond Own the Bone: AOA Critical IssuesAnderson PA, Jeray KJ, Lane JM, Binkley NC. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019;101(15):1413-1419.AOA critical issues: bone health optimisation means assessing bone status, correcting metabolic deficits and starting treatment; assess all patients >=50, and consider delaying elective surgery 3 months to treat.
- 74.Prospective cohortDefinition & diagnosisLandmark studiesFRAX and the assessment of fracture probability in men and women from the UKKanis JA, Johnell O, Oden A, Johansson H, McCloskey E. Osteoporos Int. 2008;19(4):385-97.FRAX models 10-year probability of hip and major osteoporotic fracture from clinical risk factors with or without femoral neck BMD; probabilities range about 100-fold across age and risk factors.
- 75.RetrospectiveEpidemiologySteroidsOsteoporosis medication use after hip fracture in U.S. patients between 2002 and 2011Solomon DH, Johnston SS, Boytsov NN, McMorrow D, Lane JM, Krohn KD. J Bone Miner Res. 2014;29(9):1929-37.96,887 US hip fracture patients: osteoporosis medication within 12 months only 28.5%, falling from 40.2% in 2002 to 20.5% in 2011; prior use was the strongest predictor (HR 7.45).
- 76.Systematic review / meta-analysisSystematic reviewsSteroidsFracture liaison services improve outcomes of patients with osteoporosis-related fractures: A systematic literature review and meta-analysisWu CH, Tu ST, Chang YF, Chan DC, Chien JT, Lin CH. Bone. 2018;111:92-100.74 controlled studies: fracture liaison services raised BMD testing by 24 and treatment initiation by 20 percentage points, cut re-fracture 13.4% to 6.4% and mortality 15.8% to 10.4%.
- 77.GuidelineGuidelinesSurgeryImagingGuideline summary review: an evidence-based clinical guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of adults with osteoporotic vertebral compression fracturesCho CH, Hwang SW, Mazanec DJ, O'Toole JE, Watters WC 3rd, Annaswamy TM. Spine J. 2025;25(8):1670-1687.NASS evidence-based guideline summary answering 29 questions on diagnosis and treatment of adult OVCF (literature to September 2020), with graded recommendations for imaging, bracing, augmentation and pharmacotherapy.
- 78.GuidelineGuidelinesImagingSurgeryACR Appropriateness Criteria® Management of Vertebral Compression Fractures: 2022 UpdateExpert Panels on Neurological Imaging, Interventional Radiology, and Musculoskeletal Imaging, Khan MA, Jennings JW, Baker JC, Smolock AR, Shah LM. J Am Coll Radiol. 2023;20(5S):S102-S124.ACR Appropriateness Criteria 2022 update rating imaging and treatment (including augmentation) for osteoporotic, traumatic and malignant VCF scenarios using RAND/UCLA and GRADE methods.
- 79.Expert opinionGuidelinesInternational consensus on the non-pharmacological and non-surgical management of osteoporotic vertebral fracturesPonzano M, Tibert N, Brien S, Funnell L, Gibbs JC, Keller H. Osteoporos Int. 2023;34(6):1065-1074.Modified Delphi international consensus (27-31 experts, 90.7% agreement) giving biopsychosocial recommendations on pain, nutrition, bracing, safe movement and exercise for acute and chronic vertebral fractures.
- 80.GuidelineGuidelinesSteroidsPharmacologic Treatment of Primary Osteoporosis or Low Bone Mass to Prevent Fractures in Adults: A Living Clinical Guideline From the American College of PhysiciansQaseem A, Hicks LA, Etxeandia-Ikobaltzeta I, Shamliyan T, Cooney TG, Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2023;176(2):224-238.ACP living guideline: bisphosphonates first line (strong, high certainty); denosumab second line; romosozumab or teriparatide followed by bisphosphonate only for females at very high fracture risk.
- 81.Systematic review / meta-analysisSystematic reviewsSteroidsFracture risk reduction and safety by osteoporosis treatment compared with placebo or active comparator in postmenopausal women: systematic review, network meta-analysis, and meta-regression analysis of randomised clinical trialsHändel MN, Cardoso I, von Bülow C, Rohde JF, Ussing A, Nielsen SM. BMJ. 2023;381:e068033.Network meta-analysis of 69 RCTs (>80,000 women): all agents reduce vertebral fractures; anabolics beat bisphosphonates for clinical (OR 1.49) and vertebral fractures irrespective of baseline risk.
- 82.GuidelineGuidelinesSteroidsScreening for Osteoporosis to Prevent Fractures: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation StatementUS Preventive Services Task Force, Nicholson WK, Silverstein M, Wong JB, Chelmow D, Coker TR. JAMA. 2025;333(6):498-508.USPSTF 2025: screen women >=65 and postmenopausal women <65 at increased risk for osteoporosis (B recommendations); evidence insufficient for men (I statement).
- 83.Systematic review / meta-analysisSystematic reviewsSpinal Orthoses in the Treatment of Osteoporotic Thoracolumbar Vertebral Fractures in the Elderly: A Systematic Review With Quantitative Quality AssessmentPieroh P, Spiegl UJA, Völker A, Märdian S, von der Höh NH, Osterhoff G. Global Spine J. 2023;13(1_suppl):59S-72S.DGOU systematic review of 13 studies (5 RCTs) and 8 reviews: no superiority of spinal orthoses over no orthosis in OVF; non-rigid orthoses favoured over rigid; general recommendation not possible.
- 84.Prospective cohortClassificationAO Spine-DGOU Osteoporotic Fracture Classification System: Internal Validation by the AO Spine Knowledge Forum TraumaScherer J, Joaquim A, Vaccaro A, Kanna R, El-Sharkawi M, Takahata M. Global Spine J. 2025;15(4):2152-2157.AO Spine Knowledge Forum Trauma validation of the AO Spine-DGOU OF classification (21 raters, 33 cases): inter-rater kappa 0.48-0.50 (moderate), intra-rater kappa 0.74 (substantial).
- 85.Prospective cohortEpidemiologyClassificationSurgeryMulticenter evaluation of therapeutic strategies of inpatients with osteoporotic vertebral fractures in GermanySchnake KJ, Bouzakri N, Hahn P, Franck A, Blattert TR, Zimmermann V. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2022;48(2):1401-1408.EOFTT: 707 inpatients in 16 German centres; mean age 75, 51% recalled no trauma, neurological deficit 3.1%, deformity progression linked to T-score <-3 (OR 1.97); 81.6% treated surgically, mostly kyphoplasty.
- 86.Systematic review / meta-analysisSystematic reviewsSteroidsComparison of the Clinical Efficacy of Anabolic Agents and Bisphosphonates in the Patients With Osteoporotic Vertebral Fracture: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled TrialsJeon I, Park SB, Moon BJ, Choi M, Kuh SU, Kim J. Neurospine. 2024;21(2):416-429.6 RCTs in patients with prevalent OVF: anabolic agents (teriparatide, romosozumab) reduced new vertebral fractures versus bisphosphonates (RR 0.57, high certainty) without proven faster fracture healing (RR 1.23).
- 87.Systematic review / meta-analysisSurgerySystematic reviewsA meta-analysis of complications associated with the use of cement-augmented pedicle screws in osteoporosis of spineZhang J, Wang G, Zhang N. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2021;107(7):102791.20 studies of cement-augmented pedicle screws in osteoporotic spines: screw loosening 2.0%, any cement leakage 21.8%, symptomatic leakage 1.2%, symptomatic pulmonary embolism 0.8%, adjacent fracture 3.3%.
- 88.Systematic review / meta-analysisSurgeryPrognosisSystematic reviewsMortality After Osteoporotic Vertebral Body Fractures: Cement Augmentation Versus Conservative Treatment—A Systematic Review and Meta-AnalysisWiedl A, Geiger F, Eberl J, Wirries A, Hammad A. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2025;122(22):604-610.22 studies including 2 RCTs: pooled mortality HR 0.91 (95% CI 0.73-1.15) for cement augmentation versus conservative care, not significant; registry survival advantage likely reflects confounding.
- 89.Systematic review / meta-analysisSurgerySystematic reviewsEfficacy and Safety of Posterior Long-Segment Fixation Versus Posterior Short-Segment Fixation for Kummell Disease: A Meta-AnalysisYu Y, Zeng H, Guo E, Tang B, Fang Y, Wu L. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2022;13:21514593221107509.Meta-analysis for Kummell disease: short-segment fixation shortens operation (-18 min) and blood loss (-82 mL); long-segment better maintains kyphosis (3.2 degrees less loss); complications, VAS and ODI similar.
- 90.Systematic review / meta-analysisSurgerySystematic reviewsIs Osteoporotic Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture a Contraindication to Percutaneous Kyphoplasty? A Systematic ReviewChen Y, Yin P, Hai Y, Su Q, Yang J. Pain Physician. 2021;24(6):E685-E692.8 studies (289 patients) of kyphoplasty alone for osteoporotic thoracolumbar burst fractures: VAS 6.8 to 1.1, kyphosis 21.7 to 3.2 degrees; cement leakage 7.7-45.4%; burst morphology not an absolute contraindication.PubMed 34554685 Cited on slide 43
- 91.Systematic review / meta-analysisSurgerySystematic reviewsSystematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 3 Treatment Arms for Vertebral Compression Fractures: A Comparison of Improvement in Pain, Adjacent-Level Fractures, and Quality of Life Between Vertebroplasty, Kyphoplasty, and Nonoperative ManagementHalvachizadeh S, Stalder AL, Bellut D, Hoppe S, Rossbach P, Cianfoni A. JBJS Rev. 2021;9(10).16 RCTs: vertebroplasty improved short-term pain 1.31 points more than nonoperative care; vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty equivalent; no increase in adjacent-level fractures (log OR -0.16); QOL similar.
- 92.GuidelineGuidelinesSteroidsThe 2024 UK clinical guideline for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosisGregson CL, Armstrong DJ, Avgerinou C, Bowden J, Cooper C, Douglas L. Arch Osteoporos. 2025;20(1):119.NOGG 2024 UK guideline update: clarifies very-high-risk definition, adds abaloparatide, endorses HRT first line in younger high-risk postmenopausal women, and covers vertebral fracture management and fracture liaison models.
- 93.HistoricalLandmark studiesClassificationThe three column spine and its significance in the classification of acute thoracolumbar spinal injuriesDenis F. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1983;8(8):817-31.Three-column concept from 412 CT-imaged injuries: compression, burst, seat-belt and fracture-dislocation; instability begins with failure of two columns.
- 94.HistoricalLandmark studiesClassificationA comprehensive classification of thoracic and lumbar injuriesMagerl F, Aebi M, Gertzbein SD, Harms J, Nazarian S. Eur Spine J. 1994;3(4):184-201.Comprehensive AO classification of 1,445 injuries into types A compression, B distraction and C rotation with 27 subgroups; A1 fractures were 34.7% of all injuries.
- 95.RetrospectiveLandmark studiesClassificationSurgeryThe load sharing classification of spine fracturesMcCormack T, Karaikovic E, Gaines RW. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1994;19(15):1741-4.Load-sharing classification scoring comminution, fragment apposition and kyphosis correction to predict failure of short-segment posterior fixation.
- 96.Expert opinionLandmark studiesClassificationA new classification of thoracolumbar injuries: the importance of injury morphology, the integrity of the posterior ligamentous complex, and neurologic statusVaccaro AR, Lehman RA Jr, Hurlbert RJ, Anderson PA, Harris M, Hedlund R. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005;30(20):2325-33.TLICS: injury morphology, posterior ligamentous complex integrity and neurological status scored and summed; ≤ 3 nonoperative, ≥ 5 operative, 4 indeterminate.
- 97.Prospective cohortClassificationReliability of a novel classification system for thoracolumbar injuries: the Thoracolumbar Injury Severity ScoreVaccaro AR, Baron EM, Sanfilippo J, Jacoby S, Steuve J, Grossman E. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006;31(11 Suppl):S62-9; discussion S104.Five surgeons scored 71 cases with the TLISS: over 90% agreement with the recommended treatment; MRI and morphology suggested to improve reliability.
- 98.Prospective cohortClassificationThe influence of fracture mechanism and morphology on the reliability and validity of two novel thoracolumbar injury classification systemsWhang PG, Vaccaro AR, Poelstra KA, Patel AA, Anderson DG, Albert TJ. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007;32(7):791-5.25 injuries scored with TLISS then TLICS by 5 surgeon groups: both reproducible and valid; TLICS predicted treatment in 95% of cases.
- 99.Prospective cohortClassificationThe adoption of a new classification system: time-dependent variation in interobserver reliability of the thoracolumbar injury severity score classification systemPatel AA, Vaccaro AR, Albert TJ, Hilibrand AS, Harrop JS, Anderson DG. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007;32(3):E105-10.Interobserver reliability of the TLISS improved significantly after 7 months of use at one institution, showing the system can be taught.
- 100.RetrospectiveClassificationSurgeryEvaluation of the thoracolumbar injury classification system in thoracic and lumbar spinal traumaJoaquim AF, Fernandes YB, Cavalcante RA, Fragoso RM, Honorato DC, Patel AA. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011;36(1):33-6.49 surgically treated patients: TLICS recommendation matched surgery in 96%; TLICS correlated with neurological status and Magerl/AO type.
- 101.Expert opinionClassificationThe Thoracolumbar AOSpine Injury ScoreKepler CK, Vaccaro AR, Schroeder GD, Koerner JD, Vialle LR, Aarabi B. Global Spine J. 2016;6(4):329-34.Thoracolumbar AOSpine Injury Score from 100 surgeons: A1 1, A2 2, A3 3, A4 and B1 5 points; N3 elevated to 4 points; M1 adds 1 point.
- 102.Prospective cohortClassificationReliability analysis of the AOSpine thoracolumbar spine injury classification system by a worldwide group of naïve spinal surgeonsKepler CK, Vaccaro AR, Koerner JD, Dvorak MF, Kandziora F, Rajasekaran S. Eur Spine J. 2016;25(4):1082-6.100 naive surgeons classified 25 cases twice: overall κ 0.56; type A 0.80, B 0.68, C 0.72; A4 least reliable (κ 0.19); intraobserver κ 0.68.
- 103.Narrative reviewClassificationReviewsThoracolumbar injury classification and severity score: a new paradigm for the treatment of thoracolumbar spine traumaLee JY, Vaccaro AR, Lim MR, Oner FC, Hulbert RJ, Hedlund R. J Orthop Sci. 2005;10(6):671-5.Introduces TLICS as a simpler, more reliable alternative to the Denis and AO systems for surgeons and non-surgeons.
- 104.Expert opinionClassificationValidating a newly proposed classification system for thoracolumbar spine trauma: looking to the future of the thoracolumbar injury classification and severity scoreBono CM, Vaccaro AR, Hurlbert RJ, Arnold P, Oner FC, Harrop J. J Orthop Trauma. 2006;20(8):567-72.Places TLICS in the Audigé three-phase validation framework: phases 1 and 2 complete, prospective clinical validation outstanding.
- 105.Prospective cohortClassificationAssessment of two thoracolumbar fracture classification systems as used by multiple surgeonsWood KB, Khanna G, Vaccaro AR, Arnold PM, Harris MB, Mehbod AA. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87(7):1423-9.19 surgeons classified 31 fractures twice: Denis and AO systems showed only moderate reliability, falling with subclassification.
- 106.RetrospectiveClassificationImagingClassification of thoracic and lumbar spine fractures: problems of reproducibility. A study of 53 patients using CT and MRIOner FC, Ramos LM, Simmermacher RK, Kingma PT, Diekerhof CH, Dhert WJ. Eur Spine J. 2002;11(3):235-45.Five observers, 53 injuries on CT and MRI: fair-to-moderate reliability for both AO and Denis, with Denis more reproducible than AO.
- 107.Narrative reviewClassificationReviewsThe Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Score (TLICS)Petfield JL, Vosbikian MM, Whang PG, Vaccaro AR. In: Vaccaro AR, Fehlings MG, Dvorak MF, eds. Spine and Spinal Cord Trauma: Evidence-Based Management. Thieme. 2011:345-351.Textbook chapter reviewing the evolution from Denis and AO to TLICS, the scoring domains, the surgical-approach table and the validation studies.Cited on slide 13
- 108.Expert opinionClassificationReviewsConfounders and their influence on the Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Score (TLICS)Williams AR, Grauer JN. In: Vaccaro AR, Fehlings MG, Dvorak MF, eds. Spine and Spinal Cord Trauma: Evidence-Based Management. Thieme. 2011:411-413.Elderly, osteoporotic, ankylosed, obese, polytrauma and paediatric patients alter TLICS-based decisions: fixation failure, transverse fractures, brace failure and mobilisation needs.Cited on slide 15
- 109.Narrative reviewSurgeryReviewsSurgical management of osteoporotic thoracolumbar spinal fracturesSchmidt OI, Robinson Y, Gahr RH, Dvorak MF. In: Vaccaro AR, Fehlings MG, Dvorak MF, eds. Spine and Spinal Cord Trauma: Evidence-Based Management. Thieme. 2011:414-425.Chapter on augmentation, combined instrumentation, osteotomy and complications; a T-score below −3.5 to −4 makes any fixation difficult and medical treatment is mandatory.Cited on slides 15, 37, 45
- 110.Narrative reviewReviewsManagement of thoracolumbar compression fracturesMcCall T, Dailey AT. In: Vaccaro AR, Fehlings MG, Dvorak MF, eds. Spine and Spinal Cord Trauma: Evidence-Based Management. Thieme. 2011:352-368.Chapter on Magerl A1 impaction fractures: stable with intact posterior column; osteoporosis is the leading cause; bracing has very low quality evidence.
- 111.Randomized trialLandmark studiesEffects of risedronate treatment on vertebral and nonvertebral fractures in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis: a randomized controlled trial. Vertebral Efficacy With Risedronate Therapy (VERT) Study GroupHarris ST, Watts NB, Genant HK. JAMA. 1999;282(14):1344-52.VERT-NA (2,458 women, 3 y): risedronate 5 mg daily reduced new vertebral fractures 16.3% to 11.3% (41%; 65% in year 1) and nonvertebral fractures 8.4% to 5.2% (39%).
- 112.Randomized trialLandmark studiesOnce-yearly zoledronic acid for treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosisBlack DM, Delmas PD, Eastell R. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(18):1809-22.HORIZON Pivotal Fracture Trial (7,765 women, 3 y): yearly zoledronic acid 5 mg reduced morphometric vertebral fractures 10.9% to 3.3% (RR 0.30, 70%), hip fractures 2.5% to 1.4% (HR 0.59, 41%) and nonvertebral fractures 25%; serious atrial fibrillation 1.3% vs 0.5%.
- 113.Randomized trialLandmark studiesEffects of oral ibandronate administered daily or intermittently on fracture risk in postmenopausal osteoporosisChesnut CH 3rd, Skag A, Christiansen C. J Bone Miner Res. 2004;19(8):1241-9.BONE (2,946 women, 3 y): daily oral ibandronate reduced new vertebral fractures 9.6% to 4.7% (62%), intermittent dosing 50%; no reduction in nonvertebral fractures overall.
- 114.Prospective cohortPrognosisVertebral Fractures After Discontinuation of Denosumab: A Post Hoc Analysis of the Randomized Placebo-Controlled FREEDOM Trial and Its ExtensionCummings SR, Ferrari S, Eastell R. J Bone Miner Res. 2018;33(2):190-198.FREEDOM and extension post hoc (1,001 denosumab discontinuers): vertebral fracture rate rose from 1.2 to 7.1 per 100 participant-years after stopping, with multiple vertebral fractures in 60.7% of those who fractured; prior vertebral fracture was the main risk factor.
- 115.Randomized trialLandmark studiesEffect of Abaloparatide vs Placebo on New Vertebral Fractures in Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis: A Randomized Clinical TrialMiller PD, Hattersley G, Riis BJ. JAMA. 2016;316(7):722-33.ACTIVE (2,463 women, 18 mo): abaloparatide 80 ug daily reduced new vertebral fractures 4.22% to 0.58% (86%) and nonvertebral fractures 43% (HR 0.57); hypercalcaemia 3.4% vs 6.4% with teriparatide (fracture rates from the paper's results table; the PubMed abstract shows them as a table).
- 116.Randomized trialLandmark studiesRomosozumab Treatment in Postmenopausal Women with OsteoporosisCosman F, Crittenden DB, Adachi JD. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(16):1532-1543.FRAME (7,180 women): romosozumab 210 mg monthly for 12 months reduced new vertebral fractures 1.8% to 0.5% (73%) and clinical fractures 36%; nonvertebral fractures not significantly reduced at 12 months; after transition to denosumab, vertebral fractures 2.5% vs 0.6% at 24 months (75%).
- 117.Randomized trialLandmark studiesReduction of vertebral fracture risk in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis treated with raloxifene: results from a 3-year randomized clinical trial. Multiple Outcomes of Raloxifene Evaluation (MORE) InvestigatorsEttinger B, Black DM, Mitlak BH. JAMA. 1999;282(7):637-45.MORE (7,705 women, 3 y): raloxifene 60 mg reduced new vertebral fractures 10.1% to 6.6% (RR 0.7) with no reduction in nonvertebral fractures (RR 0.9); venous thromboembolism RR 3.1.
- 118.Prospective cohortPrognosisAtypical Femur Fracture Risk versus Fragility Fracture Prevention with BisphosphonatesBlack DM, Geiger EJ, Eastell R. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(8):743-753.Kaiser Permanente cohort (196,129 women, 277 atypical femoral fractures): risk rose with bisphosphonate duration, HR 8.9 at 3 to <5 years and 43.5 at 8 years or more, fell rapidly after stopping, and was higher in Asian than White women; after 3 years of use, 149 hip fractures were prevented per 2 atypical fractures in White women.
- 119.Randomized trialLandmark studiesEffects of continuing or stopping alendronate after 5 years of treatment: the Fracture Intervention Trial Long-term Extension (FLEX): a randomized trialBlack DM, Schwartz AV, Ensrud KE. JAMA. 2006;296(24):2927-38.FLEX (1,099 women after about 5 years of alendronate): a further 5 years vs placebo; stopping caused modest BMD decline, no difference in nonvertebral fractures (RR 1.00), but more clinical vertebral fractures (5.3% vs 2.4%, RR 0.45 for continuing).
- 120.GuidelineGuidelinesDiagnosis and management of osteonecrosis of the jaw: a systematic review and international consensusKhan AA, Morrison A, Hanley DA. J Bone Miner Res. 2015;30(1):3-23.International Task Force consensus on osteonecrosis of the jaw: incidence 0.001% to 0.01% at osteoporosis doses of bisphosphonate or denosumab versus 1% to 15% at oncology doses; risk factors include glucocorticoids, dental extraction and poor oral health.
- 121.GuidelineGuidelinesPharmacological Management of Osteoporosis in Postmenopausal Women: An Endocrine Society Guideline UpdateShoback D, Rosen CJ, Black DM. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2020;105(3):dgaa048.Endocrine Society 2020 update: romosozumab for up to 1 year is recommended for postmenopausal women at very high fracture risk (severe osteoporosis or multiple vertebral fractures), followed by an antiresorptive; not within 1 year of myocardial infarction or stroke because of the cardiovascular signal in ARCH; the label carries a boxed warning.
- 122.Randomized trialLandmark studies10 years of denosumab treatment in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: results from the phase 3 randomised FREEDOM trial and open-label extensionBone HG, Wagman RB, Brandi ML. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017;5(7):513-523.FREEDOM open-label extension (up to 10 years of denosumab, 4,550 women): yearly new vertebral fracture incidence stayed at 0.9 to 1.9% and nonvertebral at 0.8 to 2.6%; lumbar spine BMD +21.7% and total hip +9.2% from baseline; 13 cases of osteonecrosis of the jaw and 2 atypical femoral fractures.
- 123.Randomized trialLandmark studiesDenosumab and teriparatide transitions in postmenopausal osteoporosis (the DATA-Switch study): extension of a randomised controlled trialLeder BZ, Tsai JN, Uihlein AV. Lancet. 2015;386(9999):1147-55.DATA-Switch (94 women, 4 y): teriparatide then denosumab raised spine BMD 18.3% and total hip 6.6%; denosumab then teriparatide caused transient bone loss at the hip and progressive loss at the radius; sequence matters, anabolic first.
- 124.Randomized trialLandmark studiesFRAME Study: The Foundation Effect of Building Bone With 1 Year of Romosozumab Leads to Continued Lower Fracture Risk After Transition to DenosumabCosman F, Crittenden DB, Ferrari S. J Bone Miner Res. 2018;33(7):1219-1226.FRAME post hoc: 1 year of romosozumab raised spine BMD 13% and total hip 7%; the T-score gain after 1 year of romosozumab plus 1 year of denosumab approximated that achieved by 7 years of continuous denosumab.
- 125.Randomized trialLandmark studiesRomosozumab (sclerostin monoclonal antibody) versus teriparatide in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis transitioning from oral bisphosphonate therapy: a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trialLangdahl BL, Libanati C, Crittenden DB. Lancet. 2017;390(10102):1585-1594.STRUCTURE (436 women transitioning from 3 or more years of oral bisphosphonate): total hip BMD +2.6% with romosozumab versus -0.6% with teriparatide at 12 months; romosozumab also improved estimated hip strength.
- 126.Prospective cohortSurgeryTeriparatide accelerates lumbar posterolateral fusion in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis: prospective studyOhtori S, Inoue G, Orita S. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012;37(23):E1464-8.57 osteoporotic women with 1- to 2-level instrumented posterolateral fusion: fusion rate 82% with daily teriparatide versus 68% with risedronate; mean time to union 8 versus 10 months.
- 127.Randomized trialSurgeryRole of Weekly Teriparatide Administration in Osseous Union Enhancement within Six Months After Posterior or Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Osteoporosis-Associated Lumbar Degenerative Disorders: A Multicenter, Prospective Randomized StudyEbata S, Takahashi J, Hasegawa T. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017;99(5):365-372.Multicentre RCT (75 osteoporotic women, PLIF or TLIF): 6 months of weekly teriparatide after surgery gave significantly higher CT fusion rates at 4 and 6 months than no teriparatide.
- 128.Randomized trialSurgeryLandmark studiesOperative compared with nonoperative treatment of a thoracolumbar burst fracture without neurological deficit. A prospective, randomized studyWood K, Buttermann G, Mehbod A, Garvey T, Jhanjee R, Sechriest V. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85(5):773-81.RCT of 47 stable thoracolumbar burst fractures without deficit, mean follow-up 44 months: kyphosis and canal remodelling similar (canal 39% to 22% operative vs 34% to 19% nonoperative), pain and return to work similar, less disability and fewer complications with nonoperative care.
- 129.Prospective cohortSurgeryNonoperative treatment versus posterior fixation for thoracolumbar junction burst fractures without neurologic deficitShen WJ, Liu TJ, Shen YS. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001;26(9):1038-45.80 thoracolumbar junction burst fractures without deficit, brace (47) vs short-segment posterior fixation (33): surgery gave less pain to 3 months and better function to 6 months, then no difference; 17 degrees of correction was gradually lost; nonoperative retropulsion remodelled from 34% to 15%; hospital charges four-fold with surgery.
- 130.Randomized trialSurgeryTreatment of traumatic thoracolumbar spine fractures: a multicenter prospective randomized study of operative versus nonsurgical treatmentSiebenga J, Leferink VJ, Segers MJ, Elzinga MJ, Bakker FC, Haarman HJ. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006;31(25):2881-90.Multicentre RCT of 34 thoracolumbar fractures without deficit (16 nonoperative, 18 short-segment posterior), mean 4.3 years: operative group had less kyphosis, better pain and function scores and more return to the original job; the dissenting trial.
- 131.Randomized trialSurgeryLandmark studiesOrthosis versus no orthosis for the treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures without neurologic injury: a multicenter prospective randomized equivalence trialBailey CS, Urquhart JC, Dvorak MF, Nadeau M, Boyd MC, Thomas KC. Spine J. 2014;14(11):2557-64.Multicentre equivalence RCT of 96 AO A3 burst fractures T11 to L3 without deficit, TLSO vs no orthosis: Roland-Morris disability at 3 months 6.8 vs 7.7, within the equivalence margin; 6 patients needed surgery.
- 132.RetrospectiveSurgeryNonoperative management of stable thoracolumbar burst fractures with early ambulation and bracingCantor JB, Lebwohl NH, Garvey T, Eismont FJ. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1993;18(8):971-6.18 burst fractures with intact posterior column treated by early ambulation in a TLSO: hospital stay 10 days, kyphosis 19 to 20 degrees at 19 months, 15 of 18 with little or no pain, retropulsed bone resorbed on CT, no neurological deterioration.
- 133.Prospective cohortSurgeryPosterior fixation of thoracolumbar burst fracture: short-segment pedicle fixation versus long-segment instrumentationTezeren G, Kuru I. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2005;18(6):485-8.18 thoracolumbar burst fractures, short-segment (9) vs long-segment (9) posterior fixation: long segment held kyphosis, sagittal index and height better; short-segment implant failure 55%; clinical outcome equal; long segment took longer with more blood loss.
- 134.Prospective cohortSurgeryImagingChanges in the disc space after fractures of the thoracolumbar spineOner FC, van der Rijt RR, Ramos LM, Dhert WJ, Verbout AJ. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998;80(5):833-9.MRI at 18 or more months of 75 thoracolumbar fractures: six disc patterns; recurrent kyphosis after posterior fixation arose from disc material creeping into the central end-plate depression left by ligamentotaxis, not from degeneration or instability.
- 135.Prospective cohortSurgeryBalloon vertebroplasty in combination with pedicle screw instrumentation: a novel technique to treat thoracic and lumbar burst fracturesVerlaan JJ, Dhert WJ, Verbout AJ, Oner FC. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005;30(3):E73-9.Phase II study of 20 thoracolumbar burst fractures: posterior short-segment fixation plus balloon reduction and calcium phosphate cement restored central and anterior body height to 78% and 91% of intact; cement leakage in 5 of 20 without sequelae.
- 136.Narrative reviewSurgeryReinforcement of thoracolumbar burst fractures with calcium phosphate cement. A biomechanical studyMermelstein LE, McLain RF, Yerby SA. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998;23(6):664-70; discussion 670-1.Cadaveric L1 burst model with short-segment pedicle screws: transpedicular calcium phosphate cement reduced screw bending moments 59% in flexion and 38% in extension and raised flexion-extension stiffness 40%.
- 137.Systematic review / meta-analysisSystematic reviewsVertebroplasty and kyphoplasty: a systematic review of 69 clinical studiesHulme PA, Krebs J, Ferguson SJ, Berlemann U. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006;31(17):1983-2001.Systematic review of 69 clinical studies of vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty: pain relief in 87% and 92%, kyphosis correction 6.6 degrees with kyphoplasty, cement leakage per vertebra 41% vertebroplasty vs 9% kyphoplasty, subsequent fracture rates similar to untreated osteoporotic patients with a prior fracture.
- 138.Systematic review / meta-analysisSystematic reviewsBalloon kyphoplasty in the management of vertebral compression fractures: an updated systematic review and meta-analysisTaylor RS, Fritzell P, Taylor RJ. Eur Spine J. 2007;16(8):1085-100.Updated systematic review and meta-analysis of balloon kyphoplasty (8 comparative studies, 35 case series): better pain, function, height and kyphosis than medical management to 3 years, at least as effective as vertebroplasty; serious adverse events rare (cement leakage 8.1%, symptomatic 0.09%; new fractures 11.1%, 9.4% adjacent).
- 139.RetrospectiveImagingCan burst fractures be predicted from plain radiographs?Ballock RT, Mackersie R, Abitbol JJ, Cervilla V, Resnick D, Garfin SR. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1992;74(1):147-50.67 thoracolumbar fractures in 49 patients: plain radiographs classified the fracture correctly in 88%; 25% of injuries would have been misdiagnosed on radiographs alone, mostly bursts read as compression fractures; CT recommended.
- 140.Prospective cohortImagingWeight-bearing radiographs in thoracolumbar fractures: do they influence management?Mehta JS, Reed MR, McVie JL, Sanderson PL. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004;29(5):564-7.28 T11 to L2 fractures imaged supine then erect: Cobb angle 11 to 18 degrees and anterior compression 34% to 46% on standing; 7 of 28 (25%) converted to surgical management.
- 141.Systematic review / meta-analysisSystematic reviewsPrognosisSpinal fractures in patients with ankylosing spinal disorders: a systematic review of the literature on treatment, neurological status and complicationsWesterveld LA, Verlaan JJ, Oner FC. Eur Spine J. 2009;18(2):145-56.Systematic review of 93 articles, 345 ankylosing spondylitis and 55 DISH patients with spinal fractures: neurological deficit on admission 67% and 40%, complications 51% and 33%, 3-month mortality 18% and 20%.
- 142.RetrospectiveSurgerySurgical timingThe effect of early spine fixation on non-neurologic outcomeKerwin AJ, Frykberg ER, Schinco MA, Griffen MM, Murphy T, Tepas JJ. J Trauma. 2005;58(1):15-21.299 spine fractures fixed within 3 days (174) or later (125): hospital stay 14 vs 21 days; pneumonia similar; mortality 6.9% early vs 2.5% late (non-significant trend); early fixation shortened ICU stay and cut pneumonia in thoracic fractures with cord injury.
- 143.RetrospectiveImagingWhole spine MRI in the assessment of acute vertebral body traumaGreen RA, Saifuddin A. Skeletal Radiol. 2004;33(3):129-35.Whole-spine MRI in 127 patients with acute vertebral body trauma: 77% had a second injured level; about a third had non-contiguous fractures.
- 144.Randomized trialLandmark studiesStronger back muscles reduce the incidence of vertebral fractures: a prospective 10 year follow-up of postmenopausal womenSinaki M, Itoi E, Wahner HW, Wollan P, Gelzcer R, Mullan BP. Bone. 2002;30(6):836-41.50 postmenopausal women, 10-year follow-up of a 2-year back-extensor strengthening programme: vertebral fractures 1.6% (6 of 378 vertebrae) vs 4.3% (14 of 322) in controls, relative risk 2.7 in controls; back-extensor strength and BMD higher with exercise.
- 145.Prospective cohortSurgeryTreatment of painful vertebral fractures by kyphoplasty in patients with primary osteoporosis: a prospective nonrandomized controlled studyKasperk C, Hillmeier J, Nöldge G, Grafe IA, Dafonseca K, Raupp D. J Bone Miner Res. 2005;20(4):604-12.Prospective nonrandomised study, 40 kyphoplasty vs 20 conservative, painful osteoporotic fractures including chronic ones, 6 months: vertebral height +12.1% vs -8.2%, pain score improved 26 to 44 vs unchanged, function improved, doctor visits 3.3 vs 8.6.
- 146.RetrospectivePrognosisIncidence of subsequent vertebral fracture after kyphoplastyFribourg D, Tang C, Sra P, Delamarter R, Bae H. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004;29(20):2270-6; discussion 2277.38 patients (47 levels) after kyphoplasty, mean 8 months: 26% had new fractures (17 in 10 patients), 8 within 2 months and all adjacent; later fractures were remote; front-loaded adjacent risk.
- 147.RetrospectivePrognosisVertebroplasty: cement leakage into the disc increases the risk of new fracture of adjacent vertebral bodyLin EP, Ekholm S, Hiwatashi A, Westesson PL. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2004;25(2):175-80.38 vertebroplasty patients: 14 new fractures, 10 with cement leakage into the disc vs 4 without; 58% of vertebrae adjacent to a leaked disc fractured vs 12% adjacent to an intact disc.PubMed 14970015 Cited on slide 37
- 148.RetrospectiveSurgeryPostoperative wound infection after instrumentation of thoracic and lumbar fracturesRechtine GR, Bono PL, Cahill D, Bolesta MJ, Chrin AM. J Orthop Trauma. 2001;15(8):566-9.235 thoracolumbar fractures, 117 instrumented: postoperative wound infection 10% (9 deep), 41% in patients with complete neurological injury; 67% polymicrobial.
- 149.RetrospectiveSurgeryFive-year follow-up examination after purely minimally invasive posterior stabilization of thoracolumbar fractures: a comparison of minimally invasive percutaneously and conventionally open treated patientsWild MH, Glees M, Plieschnegger C, Wenda K. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2007;127(5):335-43.Five-year follow-up of open (11) vs percutaneous (10) posterior stabilisation of thoracolumbar burst fractures: lower blood loss percutaneous, identical operative time, loss of correction, Hannover score and SF-36.
- 150.Prospective cohortSurgeryMinimal invasive short posterior instrumentation plus balloon kyphoplasty with calcium phosphate for burst and severe compression lumbar fracturesKorovessis P, Hadjipavlou A, Repantis T. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008;33(6):658-67.18 patients, mean age 64, lumbar burst and severe compression fractures: minimal-invasive short posterior instrumentation plus balloon kyphoplasty with calcium phosphate: kyphosis 16 to 2 degrees, anterior height 0.57 to 0.87, canal 25% to 19%, 45 minutes, 70 mL; cement leakage 4 of 18; no implant failure or loss of correction at 22 months.
- 151.RetrospectiveSurgeryShort-segment fixation of lumbar burst fractures using pedicle fixation at the level of the fractureMahar A, Kim C, Wedemeyer M, Mitsunaga L, Odell T, Johnson B. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007;32(14):1503-7.Cadaveric study and 12 patients: adding pedicle screws at the fractured level to short-segment fixation increased torsional stiffness; in patients kyphosis improved 15 degrees with 5 degrees loss and anterior height 58% to 89% to 78%.
- 152.Narrative reviewSurgerySystematic reviewsNonoperative and surgical management of thoracolumbar burst fractures: a systematic reviewSekhon LHS. In: Vaccaro AR, Fehlings MG, Dvorak MF, eds. Spine and Spinal Cord Trauma: Evidence-Based Management. Thieme. 2011:369-382.Textbook chapter reviewing the randomised and comparative studies of burst fractures without deficit (Wood, Shen, Alanay, Tezeren) and the Spine Trauma Study Group recommendations: bracing 6 to 12 weeks is a reasonable option, either approach is acceptable when surgery is chosen, and posterior approaches are favoured in the elderly with poor bone.Cited on slide 41